Why Your Utility Fee Income Is Disappearing (And What to Do About It)
- Justin Brennan
- 11 minutes ago
- 6 min read
You've been collecting $200-300 per unit every month in utility administrative fees.
That income just became a liability.
Colorado banned it. California is shutting it down. FTC launched rulemaking. Greystar paid $24 million. Mission Rock paid $495K. Thirteen lawsuits across five states. Eight California cities prohibiting the practice entirely.
Your easiest NOI line item is evaporating. And most operators don't realize it yet.
HOW UTILITY BILLBACK BECAME YOUR BEST MARGIN PLAY
Utility recovery was simple economics.
Bill residents for water, sewer, trash through a ratio utility billing system (RUBS). The formula allocates shared costs proportionally. Sounds fair. Residents pay their share. You recover costs.
Except there was a hidden layer: the administrative fee.
The structure:
Actual utility cost: $150/unit
Administrative fee: $50-150/unit
Total charge to resident: $200-300/unit
The actual utility cost? That's pass-through. You're just collecting and paying the utility company.
The administrative fee? That's yours. Pure margin. Operator profit disguised as cost recovery.
And for years, it worked. Regulators didn't care. Residents accepted it as unavoidable. Operators collected it as reliable NOI.
No more.
WHY REGULATORS JUST DECLARED WAR ON IT
Colorado House Bill 26-1013 (signed March 2026, effective immediately) is the watershed moment.
The bill didn't ban utility recovery. It banned the margin.
Four specific conditions:
1. No Markup on Actual CostsThe total charged across all residents cannot exceed what the utility company charges the property. Zero margin. Zero administrative fee. Unless separately authorized elsewhere in law (spoiler: it rarely is).
2. Common Areas Must Be Carved OutHallway lighting. Irrigation. Leasing office usage. Shared facility costs. Residents don't pay for these. The property owner does. This is where operators were hiding extra margin—rolling common area costs into resident charges.
3. Allocation Method Goes in the LeaseNo more hidden formulas living only with the third-party biller. If you're using a ratio allocation method, it has to appear in the lease or a signed addendum. Transparency required.
4. New Construction Loses the Option EntirelyAny property applying for a permit on or after July 1, 2027 must meter gas, electric, and water directly (or through submeters). RUBS only works for existing properties.
THE ENFORCEMENT IS AHEAD OF THE LEGISLATION
Here's what's scary: Regulators are already acting. Laws are still catching up.
Greystar (December 2025):$24 million settlement with FTC and Colorado. Why? Advertised rents that excluded mandatory utility fees. Residents thought they were paying $1,500 rent. Actually paying $1,650 (including utilities).
The FTC's argument: Hidden fees are deceptive advertising.
Mission Rock (October 2025):$495K settlement with California. Moved roughly 140 North Bay households onto RUBS while raising rents near California's Tenant Protection Act cap.
Utility charges ran as high as $200/month. Combined with rent increases, total housing costs crossed what the rent cap allowed.
The state's argument: Using RUBS to circumvent rent caps is illegal rent gouging.
Lawsuits Nationwide:
13+ lawsuits filed across 5 states since 2025
8 California cities now prohibit RUBS in most arrangements
More coming
THE TWO LINES CARRYING MOST EXPOSURE
Your audit needs to focus on two specific areas:
Line Item #1: Administrative/Service Fee
This is the margin piece. It functions as operator profit on a pass-through cost.
Colorado's statute specifically restricted it. That's the target.
Question to ask yourself: Does my third-party biller charge an administrative fee on top of actual utility costs? If yes, Colorado says it's illegal. California says it's illegal. More states are following.
Line Item #2: Common-Area Allocation
This is where operators hide margin by rolling shared costs into resident charges.
Hallway lighting being paid by residents? That's common area. Irrigation? Common area. Leasing office? Common area.
Colorado's bill requires these carved out. California's complaint specifically cited common-area overcharging.
Question to ask yourself: Is my biller including hallway lighting, irrigation, leasing office, or shared facility costs in the charges to residents? If yes, that's exposure.
THE TIMING TRAP IN RENT-CAPPED MARKETS
This gets worse if you operate in rent-capped jurisdictions.
Converting an existing resident to RUBS can count as a rent increase. And that stacks against the city's rent cap.
Example:
Resident paying $1,500/month
City allows 3% annual increase = $1,545 max
You convert them to RUBS, add $100/month in utility charges
Total housing cost: $1,645
That's a 9.7% increase, not 3%
City fines you. Tenant can sue.
Mission Rock ran into this exact scenario.
THE REAL AUDIT YOU NEED TO DO TODAY
Pull your lease. Call your third-party biller. Ask three questions:
Question 1: Does the allocation method appear in the lease?
If your RUBS formula lives only in the biller's system (not in signed leases), you have exposure. Colorado explicitly requires it in writing.
Question 2: Are common areas included in resident charges?
Get the biller's allocation methodology. Does it include:
Hallway/corridor lighting?
Irrigation/landscaping?
Leasing office?
Fitness center?
Pool/amenity areas?
Parking lot lighting?
If yes, Colorado says those need to be carved out and paid by the property.
Question 3: What's the administrative fee structure?
How much of the monthly charge is actual utility pass-through vs. operator margin? Colorado bans the margin. California bans it in certain contexts.
WHERE THIS STOPS WORKING (IMPORTANT CAVEAT)
Federal court rulings don't bind state courts.
A claim against the state gets argued under that state's own law. Only an eminent domain attorney in that specific state can tell you your odds.
Example: Washington, D.C.The city lifted its eviction freeze in October 2021 and never cleared the backlog. What took 3-5 months before now takes 12-16 months.
Unpaid rent climbed to $147 million from $11 million in 2020. Arrears average $2,207 per unit (highest in country).
Five of the largest owners carry more than $30 million between them.
D.C. has its own rules. Colorado's law doesn't apply there.
THE BIGGER PICTURE: FTC RULEMAKING IS STILL OPEN
The Federal Trade Commission launched rulemaking on total rent disclosure.
Comments closed in April 2026. The agency hasn't said whether it will propose a national rule.
What this means:Your utility administrative fees exist in a regulatory vacuum right now. No national standard. Multiple state/city standards. All trending toward prohibition.
Any underwriting that assumes utility administrative fees survive the next 24 months is betting on regulation nobody has written yet.
That's not a prudent assumption.
WHAT TO DO NOW (NOT LATER)
Step 1: Audit Your Current Charges
Pull rent rolls for the last 12 months. Separate actual utility pass-through costs from administrative fees. Know your exposure.
Step 2: Check Your Lease Language
Does your lease contain the allocation methodology? Or does it live only with the biller? If the latter, you're non-compliant in Colorado.
Step 3: Review Common-Area Allocation
Get the biller's methodology. Identify what's being charged to residents that should be property expense. That's exposure.
Step 4: Consult State/Local Counsel
Not federal. Your state's attorney or local housing advocate. They know the specific jurisdiction's rules and timeline.
Step 5: Model Your NOI Without Admin Fees
Run your underwriting assuming utility administrative fees disappear entirely in 24 months.
Can your properties still cash flow? Can they still refinance? If not, you have a bigger problem.
THE HONEST MATH
Utility administrative fees represent $200-300/unit monthly in margin.
On a 100-unit property: $20K-30K monthly = $240K-360K annually in NOI.
Lose that? Your NOI drops 8-15% immediately.
That affects:
Debt service coverage ratios (refinancing gets harder)
Cap rate calculations (property value drops)
Cash flow projections (deal doesn't pencil)
This isn't a nuisance regulatory issue. It's a structural NOI problem.
THE BOTTOM LINE
Your utility fee income is being banned.
Not everywhere, not yet. But systematically. Colorado first. California aggressive. FTC rulemaking open. Lawsuits multiplying. Eight cities prohibiting it. More coming.
Stop treating it as permanent income.
Start treating it as disappearing margin that you need to replace elsewhere.
Audit it today. Model without it tomorrow. Plan for life in 24 months when it's gone.
The operators who survive this transition are the ones who see it coming.
LIVE Q&A TRAINING WITH JUSTIN THIS WEEK! 6PM PST
🙏🏼 Thanks for reading!
Join our Facebook Group here!
Click here to join our WhatsApp Community.
Here's how I can help:
Book a strategy call with Justin and his team to get "eureka moment" clarity about where you're at and where you want to go with real estate investing and plan.
Get investing tools and learning by starting with The Multifamily Schooled Courses.
—Justin Brennan
Comments